Treehouse: Grow your CSS skills. Land your dream job.


Last updated on:

The :not(X) property in CSS is a negation pseudo class and accepts a simple selector1 as an argument. Essentially, just another selector of any kind.

:not matches an element that is not represented by the argument. The passed argument may not contain additonal selectors or any pseudo-element selectors.

View Demo

/* the X argument can be replaced with any simple selectors */
:not(X) {
  property: value;

In this example we have an unordered list with a single class on the li:

  <li class="different"></li>

Our CSS would select all the <li> elements except the one(s) with a class of .different.

/* Style everything but the .different class */
li:not(.different) {
  font-size: 3em;

You could also do the same using pseudo classes which are considered a simple selector.

p:not(:nth-child(2n+1)) {
  font-size: 3em;

However if we use a pseudo element selector as our argument it will not produce the expected result.

:not(::first-line) { /* ::first-line is a pseudo element selector and not a simple selector */
  color: white;

Visual representation of the varied uses of :not()

The specificity of the :not pseudo class is the specificity of its argument. The :not() pseudo class does not add to the selector specificity, unlike other pseudo-classes.

Negations may not be nested so :not(:not(...)) is never permitted. Authors should also note that since pseudo elements are not considered a simple selector, they are not valid as an argument to :not(X). Be mindful when using attribute selectors as some are not widely supported as others. Chaining :not selectors with other :not selectors is permissible.

Other Resources

Browser Support

Chrome Safari Firefox Opera IE Android iOS
14+ 4.0+ 3+ 11.1+ 9+ 2.1+ 3.0+

1 A simple selector is classified as a Type Selector, Universal Selector, Attribute Selector, Class Selector, ID Selector, or Pseudo Class Selector.


  1. mesamorpho
    Permalink to comment#

    Thanks for covering the :not() selector, and as always with useful examples!

    I would like to point out though, that the example depicted in the image of p:not(:nth-child(2n+1)) is somewhat ambiguous and may be misleading, at least without explicit reference. The example holds true when looking at your demo page, where the first child of the <div class="f"> block is a <header> element but anyone not looking at the demo page is likely going to expect that the second and fourth elements are selected/displayed with a white background — since the example selector really says: select any <p> element that is not an odd child, whereas the image shows exactly the two odd elements as being selected.

  2. razvan
    Permalink to comment#

    On the image “Visual representation of the varied uses of :not()” shouldn’t you point the 2 and 4 boxes ?
    2n+1 is an odd number.So when you say :not(odd) should result in targeting the even numbers.
    Am I wrong ?

  3. Pratip Ghosh
    Permalink to comment#

    Thanks for the wonderful article. However, I would like to know whether there is a way to identify a single element in my html page that would “not” take the general styling/css? What “not” does is specify all other element and “not” the one in the argument. I just want the opposite.

    .div-class p{font-weight: bold;}
    .div-class p:not(.no-style){font-weight: normal;}

    <div class="div-class">
    <p>This should be bold.</p>
    <p class="no-style">This should not be bold.</p>

    I would like the “p” with the “no-style” class to have a normal font weight. It’s currently the opposite. I hope to have made myself clear.


    • alpipego
      Permalink to comment#

      @Pratip: simply use straight forward css:

      p {
          font-weight: bold;
      .no-style {
          font-weight: normal;

      You don’t NOT want the paragraph with that class, but you do want the paragraph with the class no-style

  4. Jimba Tamang

    it’s amazing, I’ve no idea how many times I am going to use it.

  5. K. Alan Bates
    Permalink to comment#

    Regarding class selectors being valid “simple selectors” for a not…
    are regex class selectors considered “simple”?

    Can I create a selector (with whatever particular, correct syntax) like so…

    [class *= "foo"] not([class *= "bar"]){
       /*This element is guaranteed to be foo and guaranteed to not be bar */
       content: "Do stuff";

    Note that I’m asking because this specified rule is not working (fails SASS 3.3 compilation)

    With as hard as css has always sucked at specifying a (pretty basic) rules engine, I’m thinking not…but considered it worth the shot to ask.

  6. David Puerto
    Permalink to comment#

    .foo:not([class*=bar]){}; can be used/ful too!

  7. James Holby
    Permalink to comment#

    Just wanted to point out that :not can indeed be chained per the spec:



  8. Lucas Martins
    Permalink to comment#

    I am using

    .foo:not(.bar, .baz, .qux)

Leave a Comment

Posting Code

We highly encourage you to post problematic HTML/CSS/JavaScript over on CodePen and include the link in your post. It's much easier to see, understand, and help with when you do that.

Markdown is supported, so you can write inline code like `<div>this</div>` or multiline blocks of code in in triple backtick fences like this:

  function example() {
    element.innerHTML = "<div>code</div>";