The forums ran from 2008-2020 and are now closed and viewable here as an archive.

Home Forums Other TypeKit vs Google Web Fonts

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • Author
  • #90474

    I just add them to my main stylesheet. I haven’t used @import nor have I found a reason to.


    @standuncan Using @import effects your page load time minimally. That being said, I generally don’t use it.


    Thanks @ChristopherBurton and @joshuanhibbert, I appreciate your guys’ input.


    i like Google Web Fonts and i dont know more about Typekit, but google web fonts is providing few fonts which we have.


    @RaviDesai At the same time, most people can’t tell the difference between a good typeface from a bad one. And within the Google web font library, there are few that actually render well on screen. Google pays a very low amount to the Type Designer’s that submit to their library so perhaps that is why we’re seeing low standards. And as Matthew Butterick said, “Google Web Fonts aren’t really open source”.

    Typekit on the other hand at least cares about their product quality over product quantity. They make sure the fonts are hinted and render properly. Whether it be from the foundry or by doing it themselves. Typekit isn’t perfect either but at least they’re trying.

    I’ll be writing an article in a few months with another advocate for type designers and I’ll drop a link in this thread when it’s out.


    I like google webfonts because its FREE ;-)


    Google Web Fonts are great, I use them all the time.

    You just don’t want to go crazy adding to many of them on a site, or you will increase your load times.


    In all fairness, Typekit selection is vastly superior. Some of the best fonts ever designed are on Typekit: FF Scala, FF Absara, FF Meta, Adobe Minion, Futura, Gill Sans, and other masterful creations. You just don’t get this plateau of quality with Google fonts.

    Having said that, I would not subscribe to Typekit. They merely provide a service, i. e., you don’t get to keep the fonts. I’d rather pay a bit more upfront but get them fonts for life.

    Slightly OT, I’m unsure about the technicalities so I’d like some clearing up:

    – Do Typekit and Google Fonts resort to the same font loading method?
    – Are there drawbacks to setting up a subfolder with your fonts of choice and referring to it via the @font-face declaration vs scripting and other methods?


    I have used Google Fonts in the past, but now use TypeKit as you get their best package included in Adobe Creative Cloud.

    TypeKit’s selection is infinately better, but for a 100% free service, Google is really good and does have a few gems.

    Another advantage with both is a high quality set of scripts to get them working. @import still isn’t totally relaible, so to have methods developed and tested by the likes of Adobe and Google is a plus point.


    @alanshortis ,

    What are the differences/advantages/disadvantages of using @import vs. @font-face?


    Typekit uses encrypted @font-face which you can see within web inspector. Typekit and GWF use the same loading technology.

    Are you guys talking about using @import to import another stylesheet such as typography.css?



    > Having said that, I would not subscribe to Typekit. They merely provide a service, i. e., you don’t get to keep the fonts. I’d rather pay a bit more upfront but get them fonts for life.

    Unfortunately that’s not possible. Adobe explicitly forbids embedding .ttf/.otf files of Adobe fonts directly into a webpage in their EULA. That’s kind of the whole point of Typekit (and WebINK etc): to use Adobe fonts on the web.


    Using google you can host them on your site and call them via @font-face correct???


    There are lots of fonts on Google Web Fonts that don’t render nicely but there can be found pretty good fonts… And as it’s free, easy to use and good on performance it’s pretty cool and must for all web designers. Typekit has more quality fonts and if you do some serious work and can’t find anything that match your needs on Google Web Fonts go for it. So both is my opinion. And those that lacks Typekit in Photoshop my advice is that you definitely have to design typography in browsers.


    Can anyone recommend a free developer to build my site? I don’t think it will take that long, perhaps a month?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • The forum ‘Other’ is closed to new topics and replies.