- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2015 at 6:51 am #207839
typo_78
Participantaccording to this article, I can use the following css rule in order to specify different code for different versions of Chrome browsers.
.chromexx
– Chrome xx (change xx with number of specific version) newAt this point, I was wondering, is this a bad approach?
/* working in Chrome including v45 */ @media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) { .logotext-n { color: #f1ecd6; font-family: 'timesbi'; font-weight: normal; font-size: 180px; text-transform: lowercase; letter-spacing: -15.5px; .chrome45.margin-left: -10px; /* update for Chrome 45 issue */ } }
or should I create another css property like this:
/* working in Chrome v45 */ @media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) { .chrome45.logotext-n { color: #f1ecd6; font-family: 'timesbi'; font-weight: normal; font-size: 180px; text-transform: lowercase; letter-spacing: -15.5px; margin-left: -10px; /* update for Chrome 45 issue */ } } /* working in Chrome before v45 */ @media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) { logotext-n { color: #f1ecd6; font-family: 'timesbi'; font-weight: normal; font-size: 180px; text-transform: lowercase; letter-spacing: -15.5px; } }
In both examples, the code is working and I prefere the first version in order to avoid making another set of
css
but is that a good approach of using thiscss
rule? ThanksSeptember 9, 2015 at 8:13 am #207844typo_78
ParticipantOne thing is for sure, unfortunately, Chrome v45 have some issues when it comes to WordPress (I’ve read these days different stories). It could be a bug although I’ve not received a confirmation yet.
In other words, I didn’t find what cause the problem but I am trying to manage the situation in order to keep the elements together, like it whould be, using preferential css’s. I know that this is not the best solution, the best will be a new updated Chrome version :) until then, it will great to find the best approach to solve this (code version 1, 2 or …)
September 9, 2015 at 9:51 am #207854typo_78
ParticipantUpdate: I’ve tried the above codes (my bad) on an earlier version of Chrome (v43) and I thought that it’s a good idea to implement a specific hack only for v45 the version that produce the issue described here; Unfortunately, none of the above described in the first post will not work in v45 …
Thank you but I’m zero in
js
and coding in general; I’m just trying to put things together and somethimes are working :P nyway. I’ll have a look.September 9, 2015 at 12:27 pm #207873typo_78
ParticipantThank you very much.
So, as far as I understand, in the end will be:function getChromeVersion () { var element = document.querySelectorAll(.logotext-n)[0]; if (getChromeVersion() == 45) element.style.marginLeft = -10 + 'px' }
saved as .js file?
Is there any possibility to define multiple selectors (.logotext-n, .logotext-e, .logotext-u…, .logotext-d)?September 9, 2015 at 1:32 pm #207882typo_78
Participantoh sorry, I didn’t see your codepen :) Thanks, I’ll try that.
LE: I don’t think that a common class is a good idea, because we have different property values there :)
For example
.logotext-n {letter-spacing: -15.5px;}
,.logotext-e {letter-spacing: -13.2px;}
and so on …September 9, 2015 at 2:13 pm #207891typo_78
ParticipantIn this particular case,
letter-spacing: value
is variable on every classes; On the other hand, in older versions of Chrome (except the last stable v45) the logotext css works fine withoutmargin-left: -10px;
if that was the question.September 9, 2015 at 4:09 pm #207897Senff
ParticipantWhy reinvent the wheel?
September 9, 2015 at 11:59 pm #207905typo_78
Participant@Senff because the plugin fix the wp admin menu problem in v45 (I just tried that solution) not the described issue :)
@Shikkediel, thank you for your effort, I’ll try thatSeptember 10, 2015 at 6:03 am #207923Senff
Participantbecause the plugin fix the wp admin menu problem in v45 (I just tried that solution) not the described issue :)
My mistake, I was under the impression that was what you were trying to fix!
September 14, 2015 at 3:48 am #208134typo_78
Participant@Shikkediel I don’t thik that I understand clearly how can I convert this http://codepen.io/anon/pen/KdVMag to this http://codepen.io/anon/pen/dYYyGa; Could you be so kind and show me on my codepen example please? Thanks.
(I’ve tried this code http://codepen.io/anon/pen/ojbLZP but I can’t see how can I implement your solution);
September 14, 2015 at 11:26 pm #208163typo_78
ParticipantI really appreciate it, I’ll try that and come back with a feed-back.
September 15, 2015 at 1:34 pm #208207typo_78
Participantimportant update:
A New Version (45.0.2454.93 m) of Chrome was released; the good news is that the above described bug was fixed :)
Thank you anyway @Shikkediel for your support, your workaround will be usefull in other conditions for sure.
Kind regards, -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Other’ is closed to new topics and replies.