Sass Selector Combining

Brad Frost was asking about this the other day...

.c-btn {
    &__icon {

I guess that's technically "nesting" but the selectors come out flat:

.c-button__icon { }

The question was whether you do that or just write out the whole selector instead, as you would with vanilla CSS. Brad's post gets into all the pro's and con's of both ways.

To me, I'm firmly in the camp of not "nesting" because it makes searching for selectors so much harder. I absolutely live by being able to search my project for fully expanded class names and, ironically, just as Brad was posting that poll, I was stumped by a combined class like this and changed it in one of my own code bases.

Robin Rendle also notes the difficulty in searching as an issue with an example that has clearly gone too far!

inStyle (Modifying the Current Selector `&` in Sass)

The following is a guest post by Filip Naumovic from Salsita Software. Filip has built a Sass tool to help with an issue I know I've experienced many times. You're happily nesting in Sass. You're maybe a level or two deep, and you need to style a variation based on some parent selector. You need to either break out of the nesting and start a new nesting context, or go nuclear with @at-root. I'll let Filip tell the story of his new tool that changes that.


The Sass Ampersand

The & is an extremely useful feature in Sass (and Less). It's used when nesting. It can be a nice time-saver when you know how to use it, or a bit of a time-waster when you're struggling and could have written the same code in regular CSS.

Let's see if we can really understand it.