- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 25, 2011 at 12:01 am #35316
matthewb
MemberHi Guys i have to use a custom fonts in my web page for that i have generated css in “http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator” but it throw “Error” message when i upload my .ttf fonts. As i guess shows that it blacklisted fonts.
Can any one solve this problem?
November 25, 2011 at 5:35 am #91247matthewb
Memberi don’t have any license for that i have downloaded that from a free site. font is ‘Gill Sans MT Condensed Bold’.
November 25, 2011 at 11:52 am #91266TheDoc
MemberYou are trying to use a font that isn’t allowed to be used in that way. If you want to use it on your website you’ll need to get a proper license to do so. http://webfonts.fonts.com/en-US/Project/ChooseFonts?ViewDetails=T&ViewFontID=692595
November 25, 2011 at 6:48 pm #91308chrisburton
ParticipantThe font must be pirated.
November 25, 2011 at 10:20 pm #91316seb_z_lite
MemberI personally don’t think it’s because of this. Unless you entered the option : ” I don’t have a license” like in Cufon.
November 25, 2011 at 10:21 pm #91318seb_z_lite
Memberseriously, did any of you ever used a license for a Microsoft font? I guess I m an alien and an outlaw.
November 25, 2011 at 10:26 pm #91319chrisburton
Participant@seb_z_lite Really =/?
“i don’t have any license for that i have downloaded that from a free site“
The font is not free and comes with a license.
We all should be supporting type designers, not steal from them.
November 25, 2011 at 10:41 pm #91321seb_z_lite
MemberI support font designers. I pay for my fonts.And I said Microsoft, if I need Arial Black and I m using Linux, do you think I m going to buy it?. but, Gill Sans MT was created by mr. Gill in 1926. and here it says :
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FMID=979
Don’t worry, I support designers more than a lot of people, I just knew that somebody was going to interpret that as bragging. Alright, I said too much already. Before I start getting called a troll. Far from that, I dedicated my life to art. I m just worried when people think that a company like Microsoft deserves respect. Do you think they care about artists?
November 25, 2011 at 10:48 pm #91322chrisburton
ParticipantDoesn’t matter where Gill Sans is installed. Monotype is the foundry, it sets the rules.
My point was that Gill Sans is not free as the person above said he acquired it for free.
November 26, 2011 at 1:18 pm #91340chrisburton
ParticipantPersonally, i like to use fontsquirrel for generating the CSS but I wouldn’t recommend using google web fonts.
November 26, 2011 at 11:57 pm #91356TheDoc
MemberGoogle Web Fonts gets my vote for sure.
November 27, 2011 at 3:37 pm #91384chrisburton
ParticipantI’m just curious to know the reasons to choose Google web fonts?
November 27, 2011 at 4:47 pm #91387joshuanhibbert
MemberI don’t use Google fonts often, but I can certainly understand @TheDoc’s vote. I think the better question would be why you wouldn’t recommend Google Web Fonts @ChristopherBurton?
You say that you use Font Squirrel to generate the correct @font-face CSS, but Google Web Fonts also use @font-face. The rendering may not be as nice as Typekit, but it’s no different to using Font Squirrel.
Is it due to their selection? Not everyone will have the same tastes as you or I.
November 29, 2011 at 10:03 am #91495_dte
Member@ChristopherBurton why not use Google Web fonts?
It takes the load off your own server, gives you fully optimized and hand-hinted fonts, allows asynchronous loading of fonts if you so desire. Using FontSquirrel is a good option, but you get greater compatibility and peace of mind by using a hosted service such as Typekit or Google web fonts.
November 29, 2011 at 11:34 am #91502chrisburton
ParticipantYou have misunderstood what I was saying. I wasn’t implying that I only use Font Squirrel because it’s the only source that outputs @font-face.
This is partly why I dislike Google Web Fonts and where my opinion is valid. – http://typographica.org/2011/on-typography/roboto-typeface-is-a-four-headed-frankenstein
Comments from Matthew Butterick and Jonathan Hoefler – http://typographica.org/2011/on-typography/roboto-typeface-is-a-four-headed-frankenstein/#comment-40271
Edit: I do advocate for Typekit because I think they have a quality product and share the passion of typography. However, there are more and more foundries looking at options outside of both of these resources. This is what Hoefler & Frere-Jones are doing when they release their web fonts (currently in beta).
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘CSS’ is closed to new topics and replies.