<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Resizeable Images (At Full&#160;Resolution!)</title> <atom:link href="http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/</link> <description>Tips, Tricks, and Techniques on using Cascading Style Sheets.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: CSS Tutorials - webdesignr.de</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-50420</link> <dc:creator>CSS Tutorials - webdesignr.de</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-50420</guid> <description>[...] Tricks: Resizeable Images (At Full Resolution!) - Ein einfacher aber wirkungsvoller [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tricks: Resizeable Images (At Full Resolution!) &#8211; Ein einfacher aber wirkungsvoller [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steward</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-11746</link> <dc:creator>Steward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:47:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-11746</guid> <description>Yeah.... but 150 kb image size.... what can I say.... ))) thats sucks )))</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;. but 150 kb image size&#8230;. what can I say&#8230;. ))) thats sucks )))</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ð¡Ñ‚Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ CSS - Ð¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ð±Ñ€Ð°Ð¶Ð°ÐµÐ¼ ÑƒÐ¼ÐµÐ½ÑŒÑˆÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ Ð²Ð°Ñ€Ð¸Ð°Ð½Ñ‚ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÑŒÑˆÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð±Ñ€Ð°Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ñ‰Ñ</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-11052</link> <dc:creator>Ð¡Ñ‚Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ CSS - Ð¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ð±Ñ€Ð°Ð¶Ð°ÐµÐ¼ ÑƒÐ¼ÐµÐ½ÑŒÑˆÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ‹Ð¹ Ð²Ð°Ñ€Ð¸Ð°Ð½Ñ‚ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÑŒÑˆÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð±Ñ€Ð°Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ñ‰Ñ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-11052</guid> <description>[...] ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒÐ¸: Resizeable Images (At Full Resolution!)Popularity: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒÐ¸: Resizeable Images (At Full Resolution!)Popularity: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TwoHawks</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6681</link> <dc:creator>TwoHawks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:22:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6681</guid> <description>Thanks Chris - nice.Per Anders comment #6... although you would need to use some php or something to get around inserting inline tag code ...one can go ahead and specify the W+H, then add style=&quot;width:Wem;height:Hem;&quot; into the img tag.  Of course, then using the &#039;class style&#039; Chris made is not needed either.For those interested, I set up my em resolutions to 10px (search the net for pixels to ems)  so I do not have to calculate the equivalent Wpx value into a weird em value, so all I have to do is if the image drops in at Width=560 and Height=601, the em&#039;s I set are width:56;height:60.1, and it works great.  That&#039;s 1 to 1 ratio... it can, of course, be adjused to anything you want.Just to note, I tried dozens of ways to try to allow for specifying the H+W in the img tag and doing the rest from the style sheet, but I do not think its possible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris &#8211; nice.</p><p>Per Anders comment #6&#8230; although you would need to use some php or something to get around inserting inline tag code &#8230;one can go ahead and specify the W+H, then add style=&#8221;width:Wem;height:Hem;&#8221; into the img tag.  Of course, then using the &#8216;class style&#8217; Chris made is not needed either.</p><p>For those interested, I set up my em resolutions to 10px (search the net for pixels to ems)  so I do not have to calculate the equivalent Wpx value into a weird em value, so all I have to do is if the image drops in at Width=560 and Height=601, the em&#8217;s I set are width:56;height:60.1, and it works great.  That&#8217;s 1 to 1 ratio&#8230; it can, of course, be adjused to anything you want.</p><p>Just to note, I tried dozens of ways to try to allow for specifying the H+W in the img tag and doing the rest from the style sheet, but I do not think its possible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6489</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6489</guid> <description>It&#039;s a nice trick. I&#039;ve used this technique alot in the past, though I would (personally) would never use a full size image. Not a negative, it just seems that if the point is to enhance the user experience for visually impaired users who would enlarge their font size manually, they&#039;re probably more interested in the content than downloading a high res image. I think there are plenty of uses for this (artist sites come to mind), but I feel that having high resolution images scaled down through CSS is something that should probably be used judiciously. In general, its a great trick and if you combine it with the old zoom layout techniques, you can get a really nice layout that fully resizes in most browsers (even in IE5).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice trick. I&#8217;ve used this technique alot in the past, though I would (personally) would never use a full size image. Not a negative, it just seems that if the point is to enhance the user experience for visually impaired users who would enlarge their font size manually, they&#8217;re probably more interested in the content than downloading a high res image. I think there are plenty of uses for this (artist sites come to mind), but I feel that having high resolution images scaled down through CSS is something that should probably be used judiciously. In general, its a great trick and if you combine it with the old zoom layout techniques, you can get a really nice layout that fully resizes in most browsers (even in IE5).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Siegfried</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6143</link> <dc:creator>Siegfried</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-6143</guid> <description>I often combine this with max-width set so the maximum physical size and min-width set to half the physical size (in pixel this time). Does not work with IE </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often combine this with max-width set so the maximum physical size and min-width set to half the physical size (in pixel this time). Does not work with IE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Links of&#160;Interest - CSS-Tricks</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5872</link> <dc:creator>Links of&#160;Interest - CSS-Tricks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5872</guid> <description>[...] of resizeable&#8230; This is years old but its like my example of resizeable images only with an entire web layout. Again, I realize that FF3 and the new Opera are already doing this [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of resizeable&#8230; This is years old but its like my example of resizeable images only with an entire web layout. Again, I realize that FF3 and the new Opera are already doing this [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weekend Links - Javascript Favelets, Prototype Cheat Sheet, Reverse IP Domain Check, Resizable Images, ICANN Domain Tasting</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5744</link> <dc:creator>Weekend Links - Javascript Favelets, Prototype Cheat Sheet, Reverse IP Domain Check, Resizable Images, ICANN Domain Tasting</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:47:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5744</guid> <description>[...] http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a
href="http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/" rel="nofollow">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tino</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5650</link> <dc:creator>Tino</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5650</guid> <description>a very simple solution and quite effective, thanks for sharing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a very simple solution and quite effective, thanks for sharing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Coyier</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5532</link> <dc:creator>Chris Coyier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/resizeable-images-at-full-resolution/#comment-5532</guid> <description>@Tomek: Thanks for creating those screenshots! That is really interesting. I am not seeing those results exactly, although I think I was doing so much text resizing creating this that I think I didn&#039;t realize how small the &quot;real&quot; default was.  I think if you kick it up one notch, the cross browser results are a lot better.@Dennison: Yes, it does bloat size, but it doesn&#039;t have to be as drastic as this example. Just enlarging enough for one solid notch up would generally be fine I guess. People generally don&#039;t need to view body text at 72 pt =)  And thanks for that link! That is an awesome example of using this in a real layout.@Jermayn: I&#039;m actually not sure about IE7, but I know that the latest version of Opera and Firefox both have built in image enlargement, and it works very well. So, this is probably pretty much an outdated technique. I just thought it was kinda cool....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tomek: Thanks for creating those screenshots! That is really interesting. I am not seeing those results exactly, although I think I was doing so much text resizing creating this that I think I didn&#8217;t realize how small the &#8220;real&#8221; default was.  I think if you kick it up one notch, the cross browser results are a lot better.</p><p>@Dennison: Yes, it does bloat size, but it doesn&#8217;t have to be as drastic as this example. Just enlarging enough for one solid notch up would generally be fine I guess. People generally don&#8217;t need to view body text at 72 pt =)  And thanks for that link! That is an awesome example of using this in a real layout.</p><p>@Jermayn: I&#8217;m actually not sure about IE7, but I know that the latest version of Opera and Firefox both have built in image enlargement, and it works very well. So, this is probably pretty much an outdated technique. I just thought it was kinda cool&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.css-tricks.com

Served from: css-tricks.com @ 2010-09-02 17:11:42 -->