<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Poll Results: Browser Choice Sans Developer&#160;Tools</title> <atom:link href="http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/</link> <description>Tips, Tricks, and Techniques on using Cascading Style Sheets.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-59973</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-59973</guid> <description>What shocks me is there were 324 people out there that actually use IE to develop.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What shocks me is there were 324 people out there that actually use IE to develop.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jackson</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-59516</link> <dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-59516</guid> <description>I was playing around with Chrome&#039;s web inspector -- and I swear it looks like they completely used Safari&#039;s Web Inspector.  The nomenclature, the layout, the graphics, EVERYTHING is identical to Safari&#039;s Web Inspector.  It&#039;s quite creepy.  But, I can&#039;t complain. I think Safari 4&#039;s Web Inspector is flat-out amazing.   I just wish it had the ruler/dimensions feature from Firebug, which lets you visualize sizes better. It&#039;s feature for viewing dimensions/padding/width/margins isn&#039;t as nice as Firebug&#039;s.Over and out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was playing around with Chrome&#8217;s web inspector &#8212; and I swear it looks like they completely used Safari&#8217;s Web Inspector.  The nomenclature, the layout, the graphics, EVERYTHING is identical to Safari&#8217;s Web Inspector.  It&#8217;s quite creepy.  But, I can&#8217;t complain. I think Safari 4&#8217;s Web Inspector is flat-out amazing.   I just wish it had the ruler/dimensions feature from Firebug, which lets you visualize sizes better. It&#8217;s feature for viewing dimensions/padding/width/margins isn&#8217;t as nice as Firebug&#8217;s.</p><p>Over and out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ric</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-58231</link> <dc:creator>ric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:17:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-58231</guid> <description>I&#039;d swap Firefox &amp; Safari, but otherwise it&#039;s pretty much as I would have expected.IE&#039;s 5th position just goes to show that our little niche group of pixel enthusiasts are fairly far removed from the mainstream. If only every interwebs pole showed the same result!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d swap Firefox &amp; Safari, but otherwise it&#8217;s pretty much as I would have expected.</p><p>IE&#8217;s 5th position just goes to show that our little niche group of pixel enthusiasts are fairly far removed from the mainstream. If only every interwebs pole showed the same result!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nfusion satellite</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-58230</link> <dc:creator>nfusion satellite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:23:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-58230</guid> <description>Yes its really nice listing.  Firefox comes to top and internet explore moves to fifth position...!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes its really nice listing.  Firefox comes to top and internet explore moves to fifth position&#8230;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Webmaster, Tour Operator in Bangladesh</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-58197</link> <dc:creator>Webmaster, Tour Operator in Bangladesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:13:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-58197</guid> <description>It&#039;s really good achievement for Chrome to get third position which is a new launched browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really good achievement for Chrome to get third position which is a new launched browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-57994</link> <dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-57994</guid> <description>Oh, and this is the reason I can&#039;t stand to open Firefox: http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/06/cold__warm_starts.png(From http://lifehacker.com/5286869/lifehacker-speed-tests-safari-4-chrome-2-and-more )</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and this is the reason I can&#8217;t stand to open Firefox:<br /> <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/06/cold__warm_starts.png" rel="nofollow">http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/06/cold__warm_starts.png</a></p><p>(From <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5286869/lifehacker-speed-tests-safari-4-chrome-2-and-more" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5286869/lifehacker-speed-tests-safari-4-chrome-2-and-more</a> )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-57993</link> <dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-57993</guid> <description>I think you should poll firefox users to see how many of them have tried other browsers. I would think a good deal of them feel they have the best browser, so they&#039;ll not even bother.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should poll firefox users to see how many of them have tried other browsers. I would think a good deal of them feel they have the best browser, so they&#8217;ll not even bother.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rata</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-57946</link> <dc:creator>Rata</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:41:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-57946</guid> <description>On my Mac I love iCab :) Since years. Did anybody vote for that? Just nosy 8-)But for daily use Safari 4.Kind regards Rata</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my Mac I love iCab :)<br /> Since years.<br /> Did anybody vote for that? Just nosy 8-)</p><p>But for daily use Safari 4.</p><p>Kind regards<br /> Rata</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-57934</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-57934</guid> <description>In addition to right- or control-clicking and selecting &quot;Inspect Element,&quot; if you just go to the Web Inspector (command+option+i) you just click on the magnifying glass on the bottom left, basically the same as clicking &quot;inspect&quot; in Firebug. Mouse over the page and the different areas and objects highlight, click and it selects the line in the Inspector. http://screencast.com/t/yRslo3oP6pAnd AC already mentioned, you can edit the CSS too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to right- or control-clicking and selecting &#8220;Inspect Element,&#8221; if you just go to the Web Inspector (command+option+i) you just click on the magnifying glass on the bottom left, basically the same as clicking &#8220;inspect&#8221; in Firebug. Mouse over the page and the different areas and objects highlight, click and it selects the line in the Inspector.<br /> <a href="http://screencast.com/t/yRslo3oP6p" rel="nofollow">http://screencast.com/t/yRslo3oP6p</a></p><p>And AC already mentioned, you can edit the CSS too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmitry</title><link>http://css-tricks.com/poll-results-browser-choice-sans-developer-tools/#comment-57900</link> <dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:37:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://css-tricks.com/?p=2993#comment-57900</guid> <description>”I think most people are in agreement that you just can’t beat Firebug“ — I don&#039;t think so. IE8 devtools are sometimes better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>”I think most people are in agreement that you just can’t beat Firebug“ — I don&#8217;t think so. IE8 devtools are sometimes better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.css-tricks.com

Served from: css-tricks.com @ 2010-03-22 05:31:57 -->