treehouse : what would you like to learn today?
Web Design Web Development iOS Development

[Solved] Does IE9 support color:transparent and li:nth-child(1)?

  • does IE9 support color:transparent and li:nth-child(1)? That's font color transparent.

    I'm doing something ie8 pukes on but I can live with it if ie9 picks it up. Thanks

  • IE9 does support :nth-child() pseudo-selectors.

    However I'm facing some difficulties finding a source regarding the transparent keyword. I know it was first introduced in CSS1 as a valid value for the background-color property.

    Then, CSS2 allowed border-color to have transparent as a valid value. Now, as far as CSS3 is concerned, transparent has become a valid value for anything accepting a color value.

    But, I don't know where IE9 stands on the topic. I'd say it supports it on both border-color and background-color, for sure. But I don't know it's okay for the color property.

    Anyone wanna spread some knowledge here?

    EDIT: I just tested it, it does support transparent as a value for the color property. You're free to go.

  • IE9 supports rgba & hsla (AFAIK) so it should be fine although you may have to use 0 opacity rather than 'transparent'.

    IE9 also supports nth-child (again AFAIK): http://caniuse.com/#search=nth-child

  • I couldnt find it either. And dont have ie9 to test. Still on a stupid XP

  • @Eric: I edited my first post to answer your question.

    @Paulie_D: not sure opacity as a better browser support than transparent. Depends on what he's planning to do with it.

  • @hugoGiraudel cool thank you

  • @Paulie_D: not sure opacity as a better browser support than transparent. Depends on what he's planning to do with it.

    I'm referencing 'opacity' as the 0 in RGBA and alpha in HSLA not as a CSS property.

    Logically, if RGBA and HSLA are supported then transparent color is an option as

    color : rgba (0,0,0,0) /* transparent text */
    

    As you have found the KEYWORD is also supported which, I suppose was his question but it's just shorthand for the other ways of doing it.

  • @Paulie_D: oh okay, my bad then. I thought you were talking about the opacity property.