What are you trying to achieve? The main search engines don't use meta keywords to affect page ranking.
I would ask your clients to use your design with the link in the footer if they appreciated your work. That way, they are in control and you get a mention that might be of some use.
You will be better off putting a link to your site in the footer of the website. Since it's a link, it will mean more for your site and also, that's usually the place everyone looks to find out who designed the site.
I love how fast I get good, quality responses in this forum... I would love to see it expanded to other web design/development tasks.
This just goes to show how little I know about SEO and why I have an expert that does it for me when the clients asks for it.
I assumed Keywords were still a fundamental part of SEO =D
I'll stick with my current route of utilizing the link in the footer if the client allows and ignore the Meta Keyword connection. That's one thing I love about Wordpress, it allows me to utilize a simple checkbox that the customer can change to allow/disallow a footer link.
Meta keywords are not as important as they once were.
As for a link in the footer, I always thought that appeared cheap and unprofessional. I usually would just add a section at the top of their CSS/JS. Or if the project is more of a web industry related thing, perhaps in the about page.
It all depends on the project. I generally do it for small-scale projects as it's become common practice. It's actually part of the contract I have clients sign. If they don't want it to be a part of a project, that's okay! I just increase the project cost by a little bit.
But isn't that what your portfolio is for, to display the work you've done? And most importantly, why should the client pay you not to advertise on the site they've already paid for? Asking is one thing but I don't believe driving up the price is the right way to go about it if they decline. That's just my opinion on the topic.
Because I'm essentially offering a discount to include it. They aren't paying me to not do it, they are choosing to remove a discount (I should have mentioned that).
Cds/albums list the producer, books list the typesetting/printing house. Nobody finds that producer's or printing house's portfolio by magically landing on their website; people learn of them from the cd or book until they build their reputation.
If you work for an established co./team (or indeed, if you don't want your name associated with the site), there's no need for a mention. But if you're an indie freelancer, startup, small team and it's a good site, then by all means why wouldn't you want a mention? We're talking about the last tiny line at the bottom of the footer, where people are accustomed to finding such info, as @Bonzai noted.
Future customers are only going to hear of you through word-of-mouth and site footer mentions. When you're established, there won't be any need; -heck, by then, sites might want to proudly namecheck your webco as having des/dev'd their site. I don't see right/wrong or taste/tactless coming into play. Are you going to ask The Pixies or Patti Smith to not put your name in the liner notes as the producer?
@jeffc Print is different from web. I think I'm just used to seeing horrible looking footer advertisements from the designer. I do like how Jessica Hische uses a colophon for Erik Marinovich's site.
If it flows, great. But I wouldn't design the footer around "site by name". The analogy works if it's required (product licensing of some sort), otherwise I disagree.
Is it disrespectful for a designer/developer to add their company name within the keyword list of a website they have designed/developed?
Before I get blasted let me state that when I create a design I give the client the design with and without a small logo and link in the footer.
But is stuffing an additional mention in the Keywords (especially when there is plenty of space) uncouth?
What are you trying to achieve? The main search engines don't use meta keywords to affect page ranking.
I would ask your clients to use your design with the link in the footer if they appreciated your work. That way, they are in control and you get a mention that might be of some use.
I wouldn't do it just because there's really no reason to.
You will be better off putting a link to your site in the footer of the website. Since it's a link, it will mean more for your site and also, that's usually the place everyone looks to find out who designed the site.
I love how fast I get good, quality responses in this forum... I would love to see it expanded to other web design/development tasks.
This just goes to show how little I know about SEO and why I have an expert that does it for me when the clients asks for it.
I assumed Keywords were still a fundamental part of SEO =D
I'll stick with my current route of utilizing the link in the footer if the client allows and ignore the Meta Keyword connection. That's one thing I love about Wordpress, it allows me to utilize a simple checkbox that the customer can change to allow/disallow a footer link.
Meta keywords are not as important as they once were.
As for a link in the footer, I always thought that appeared cheap and unprofessional. I usually would just add a section at the top of their CSS/JS. Or if the project is more of a web industry related thing, perhaps in the about page.
It all depends on the project. I generally do it for small-scale projects as it's become common practice. It's actually part of the contract I have clients sign. If they don't want it to be a part of a project, that's okay! I just increase the project cost by a little bit.
But isn't that what your portfolio is for, to display the work you've done? And most importantly, why should the client pay you not to advertise on the site they've already paid for? Asking is one thing but I don't believe driving up the price is the right way to go about it if they decline. That's just my opinion on the topic.
i'm with chris on this. +1 for not advertising yourself on a paying client's website.
Because I'm essentially offering a discount to include it. They aren't paying me to not do it, they are choosing to remove a discount (I should have mentioned that).
Ah, okay. That makes better sense (even though I disagree).
Perhaps times have changed, but I'd say it's still common practice; though I agree that doesn't necessarily make it 'right'.
Cds/albums list the producer, books list the typesetting/printing house. Nobody finds that producer's or printing house's portfolio by magically landing on their website; people learn of them from the cd or book until they build their reputation.
If you work for an established co./team (or indeed, if you don't want your name associated with the site), there's no need for a mention. But if you're an indie freelancer, startup, small team and it's a good site, then by all means why wouldn't you want a mention? We're talking about the last tiny line at the bottom of the footer, where people are accustomed to finding such info, as @Bonzai noted.
Future customers are only going to hear of you through word-of-mouth and site footer mentions. When you're established, there won't be any need; -heck, by then, sites might want to proudly namecheck your webco as having des/dev'd their site. I don't see right/wrong or taste/tactless coming into play. Are you going to ask The Pixies or Patti Smith to not put your name in the liner notes as the producer?
@jeffc Print is different from web. I think I'm just used to seeing horrible looking footer advertisements from the designer. I do like how Jessica Hische uses a colophon for Erik Marinovich's site.
@chrisburton Agreed, but I was only referring to a "site by xyz" mention, not an actual ad. I think the music producer analogy is apt, though.
If it flows, great. But I wouldn't design the footer around "site by name". The analogy works if it's required (product licensing of some sort), otherwise I disagree.