Comments on: Filtering Blocks v2 http://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/ Tips, Tricks, and Techniques on using Cascading Style Sheets. Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:59:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Yonghttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-68334 Yong Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:09:52 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-68334 It doesn't work with Videobox v.1.1 :-( http://www.networkworking.com/media_placements.html It doesn’t work with Videobox v.1.1 :-(
http://www.networkworking.com/media_placements.html

]]> By: Anthttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67895 Ant Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:02:11 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67895 Yeah, I did similar thing today, but with select. Design with tabs is better and more usable. Yeah, I did similar thing today, but with select.
Design with tabs is better and more usable.

]]> By: WMusehttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67830 WMuse Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:02:01 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67830 @iPadThere are many cases in which Javascript may be disabled for compatibility with with some accessibility devices for the purpose of site interaction or hardware based screen reader as oppose to one being software driven on a full computer.Another case is where not everyone is on a newer mobile device that may not fully support javascript so having things degrade nicely with things turned off increases the sites viewership in some situations.Looking at it realistically even in small percentages the number of people can easily be more then 50,000+ potential viewers that you're simply going to miss out on. This is of course all entirely relative to the intended audience of your content as well.Don't underestimate the amount of people out there though that really need the content to degrade properly to be able to experience it. @iPad

There are many cases in which Javascript may be disabled for compatibility with with some accessibility devices for the purpose of site interaction or hardware based screen reader as oppose to one being software driven on a full computer.

Another case is where not everyone is on a newer mobile device that may not fully support javascript so having things degrade nicely with things turned off increases the sites viewership in some situations.

Looking at it realistically even in small percentages the number of people can easily be more then 50,000+ potential viewers that you’re simply going to miss out on. This is of course all entirely relative to the intended audience of your content as well.

Don’t underestimate the amount of people out there though that really need the content to degrade properly to be able to experience it.

]]> By: iPadhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67609 iPad Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:12:30 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67609 Who use browsers with Javascript disabled? We should move forward with this... Who use browsers with Javascript disabled? We should move forward with this…

]]> By: Nathanhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67585 Nathan Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:22:28 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67585 Great, thanks for this. I'm using the first version for my www.nathanbweb.com, but I'll consider revising. Great, thanks for this. I’m using the first version for my http://www.nathanbweb.com, but I’ll consider revising.

]]> By: Billhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67582 Bill Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:43:56 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67582 That's what I was going to say.cursor:pointer; That’s what I was going to say.

cursor:pointer;

]]> By: Benjamin Mayohttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67581 Benjamin Mayo Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:12:35 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67581 That's pretty viable. The JS would just need to know the pagination number. Then, once the items are filtered, logic checks whether the number displayed is smaller than the limit. If it is, perform an AJAX call to the server-side with a param to return (limit - num) items. The data that is returned is then added to the set. That’s pretty viable. The JS would just need to know the pagination number. Then, once the items are filtered, logic checks whether the number displayed is smaller than the limit. If it is, perform an AJAX call to the server-side with a param to return (limit – num) items. The data that is returned is then added to the set.

]]> By: kevinhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67580 kevin Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:47:09 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67580 Really interesting, could be pretty usefull integrated into wp. Really interesting, could be pretty usefull integrated into wp.

]]> By: Benhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67575 Ben Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:18:49 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67575 I have an idea for v3.Lets say the list is dynamic and is using pagination and has a limit of say 10 items.And when I filter out some and are left with 3 items or whatever, it would grab 7 other items from the DB to make up.I'd really like to see that.And nice post, this is the <i>only</i> good web development blog left. I have an idea for v3.

Lets say the list is dynamic and is using pagination and has a limit of say 10 items.

And when I filter out some and are left with 3 items or whatever, it would grab 7 other items from the DB to make up.

I’d really like to see that.

And nice post, this is the only good web development blog left.

]]> By: Joshhttp://css-tricks.com/filtering-blocks-v2/#comment-67573 Josh Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000 http://css-tricks.com/?p=5235#comment-67573 Hmm.... why does this not work for me in Firefox (3.0.10)?? Even worse... it's work in IE! ahhh! The world is ending!But seriously.... any ideas? Hmm…. why does this not work for me in Firefox (3.0.10)?? Even worse… it’s work in IE! ahhh! The world is ending!

But seriously…. any ideas?

]]>