I rolled out a new design this weekend! As usual it's a bit of an aesthetic overhaul (blue!). I'm going to cover the why, the new aspects, and some of the new technology involved. RSS readers, you'll have to make the jump and look around =).
And now, a note about critiquing: I love critiques! If you want to rip this design to shreds, please do so. I have my bachelors in Art and part of that was getting torn apart in critiques when deserved. It makes us better. I am accepting all criticism, and I am also open to changes if I see a trend in comments or something is said that resonates with me. That said, I'm not open to generically negative comments like "I liked the old design better." I've even already heard nonsense from people who have "lost respect" for me. All that does is hurt my feelings and in turn, make me lose respect for them. Comments like these are often fear-induced who-moved-my-cheese reactions, not careful considerations. Like all comment threads on this site, this one will be moderated. I spend a lot of time with this site and this design reflects what I consider to be improvements across many aspects. Please take the time you need to let the design sink in and consider it, and comment below with your thoughts. Thanks =)
Why?
This isn't the type of design that ends up in CSS galleries. It has ads on it. It's very utilitarian. It just delivers the type of content that this site has in a (hopefully) very findable and easily digestible way. The font size of body text in articles in this new design is up to a fairly large 16px. My eyesight is fine and I I haven't heard any big complaints about readability before, but lately I've been finding myself bumping up webpages a few notches because I find large type easier to read quickly with higher comprehension. Or maybe it's in my head, I dunno.
I also felt the need to rejigger some of the advertising on the site. I dropped some of the zones I felt were awkwardly placed. I added a few new ones and adjusted others. There is about the same amount as there ever was, I just feel like it's integrated nicer. If anyone is interested, there are zones still open on BuySellAds.
Speed is also a factor. There are less images in this theme which helps speed things up a tad. I tried to sprite things as much as I could of course. I'm rocking about a 2 second page load time on average, which isn't amazing but I think is decent for a site with this much stuff on it. Some of the slowest stuff is external, so we'll see what happens there...
History
For longevity's sake, I'm keeping my archive of old embarrassing designs on a new Design History page.
New Stuff
- Linkage has returned!
- Site is running WordPress 3.0.1
- The site now fluid width for the first time ever. It fits into 1024px screens with no horizontal scroll and spreads up to 1200px. Not a huge spread. One of the things I like the least about fluid width designs is when all that changes is the line length of text. There are line length changes here, but they are fairly reigned in and there are subtle layout adjustments where needed.
- There are the new official twitter buttons on posts. I've always been a little sour on social media buttons. For example, if you are a Delicious user, you know the tools added to your browser are 10x better than a link on a website. However, 1) I kind of like how these buttons work 2) Twitter is my favorite social site and 3) I can now feel like I'm not throwing away potential traffic from some ideological stand.
Removed Stuff
- The latest tweet bubble is gone. That was in the last two or three designs and I'm now over it. I feel like many times just seeing my latest tweet was weirdly out of place. More importantly, it was slow to load (I never did any caching). There are still social media links in the footer (including some new ones!)
- A long time ago I used to allow people to "register" for the site through WordPress. It was short lived as it ended up having very little purpose. There were about 1,000 registered users, half or more of them spam. I have always wanted to get rid of those users to clean up the database. The problem is, deleting a user in WordPress means you need to attribute their comments to someone else or delete them. I didn't want to delete potentially valuable comments. So... there is one generic user left called "Old Registered User" to which those comments are attributed. Kinda sucks, but it's all stuff that is years old and there isn't all that much of it.
Technology Notes
What would a redesign be on a site like this without newfangled technology?
CSS3
- There are CSS Triangles in use. The main navigation uses them to help indicate current location and the voting question bubble uses them as well. The voting bubble even uses two of them on top of each other to achieve a sort of triangle-with-border effect.

- The VOTE section features a question bubble which uses a gradient background as well as rounded corners (as do many other elements).
- The various list-of-links in the sidebar for helping explore this site and others have a link nudge effect done with CSS3.
- The PROPS section features little cards which perform a 3D flipping effect in WebKit browsers.
- The boxes in the right of the footer also have an animation effect where information about that subject will slide up from below when moused over.

If you don't have access to a WebKit browser, you can see a screencast. Safari 5 users, are you seeing lots of "blinking" and awkward flashing when using some of the interactive things in the footer? Chrome is fine. Weird.
- There is a small use of CSS media queries where the footer rearranges slightly if the design is at it's widest.


The 125x125 ads in the sidebar also do a bit of a shuffle via @media queries. When the design is at it's widest they are arranged 3x2 and any narrower, 2x3.
- Part of dealing with fluid width meant making multi-column designs utilize percentages. That means the images in those columns need to use
img { max-width: 100%; }so they can shrink/grow with the column as needed.
All of these effects I would consider progressive enhancement in that browsers that don't support any particular feature fall back to a plainer but acceptable experience. For instance, the 3D flip cards just instantly show their "backs" upon rollover.
HTML5
- New DOCTYPE, use of new elements, etc. Basically it just feels good to be using the simplification that HTML5 offers and the more semantic elements. I probably didn't do a totally perfect job on using all the new elements. This will likely evolve over time.
- The video pages (example) now use HTML5
<video>tags to display video. They will play natively in WebKit browsers which support H.264. Browsers which don't will fall back to Silverlight first, then to Flash using mediaelement.js. The UI controls remain consistent no matter which technology is in use. I would have liked to go fluid width with the video but there were many problems with that (which I may post about). Particularly nice is the jump-forward abilities of these new players (without requiring preload) that the old player could never do. - The search form is now literally just a styled input, meaning there isn't the weird line-height issues I had with the old designs image based background. HTML5 helps out in WebKit browsers with
<input type=search results=5 placeholder=Search... name=s>allowing this look and functionality:


What's with that awkward outline highlight? Might be a WebKit bug.
- The comment form features additional HTML5 form features. The fields have placeholder values and also use the "required" attribute meaning modern browsers won't even attempt to submit the comment without the required values (which can lead to an ugly WordPress error page).

jQuery
- Anything that jQuery does that it used to do in the old design (organic tabs, toggling the search limiter, etc) it still does, but has been rewritten to be more efficient. For example the code now handles both organic tabs sections with one block of code instead of having it split up like it was before.
- The homepage does "fadeouts" on the recent articles. I hoped it would help remove some repetitive page clutter while adding some visual interest. I had it working by using an :after pseudo element absolutely positioned to the bottom of each post, which would disappear on hover. I wanted the fading effect though, and CSS does not yet allow transitions/animations on pseudo elements. So I went with jQuery.
- I'm having jQuery look for buttons on the page that contain the text "View Demo" or "Download Files" and do a little HTML manipulation and styling. Perhaps not an ideal method, but this makes it backwards compatible with my whole backlog of posts while keeping the button markup really simple.
- Notice the sidebar has a background color to it that stretches from bottom to top of the white main content area. In early iterations of this design, I made the sidebar of a static width and used faux columns to fake the equal heights. But ultimately I decided that a fluid width sidebar would be cooler, which makes faux columns not possible. So to accomplish the equal heights, I have a simple resizing function which tests the height of the main content and if it's larger than the height of the sidebar, grow the sidebar to match. It's a bit janky... it has to run the resizer 2 seconds after the page load to account for third party content in the sidebar which may not be there on DOM ready or window load. It also runs it on window resize in case reflow affects the situation. It doesn't work perfectly and it warrents a re-think at some point.
To Come
I'm working through some ideas for the forums to make them more awesome than they already are, so watch for that in maybe the next few months.
Not bad, but lose the fade out on listing page.
The theory behind the fade-out, besides being being of possible visual intrigue and an enticement to click what is revealed, is that it removes repetitive design elements from displaying at once.
Read more →
Read more →
Read more →
Read more →
Read more →
…all stacked on top of one another can be cluttery-feeling. I got the idea from listening to an iPhone app design talk at a conference where one of the principals presented was not using repetitive UI controls like that. Perhaps on the web we have more room to get away with it, but I’m just giving it a go for now. If enough people hate it (after some time), it can be rethought.
I see your reasoning for the fades, and I think it works. What I think would make it better, would be if it wasn’t fade out to nothing, but rather fade out to almost nothing (say 8 or 10% opacity). That way it remains low in the hierarchy while browsing over the page, but having it fade in from nothing over and over is more noticeable than having them not fade at all (possibly because the eye is drawn to motion, so less motion (less fading) should be less distracting). Sorry if that didn’t make any sense.
…all the transitions mesmerizing when I fist saw them, I wasted like 5 minutes playing with all the new animation.
Although I get the idea, and I guess it could fit in some websites, I find the fade to be just annoying.
With that said, I have a good first impression of your new design, though it will take some getting used to (was thinking I’d clicked the wrong bookmark the first time I saw it).
I like the fades visually, and for me they seem to reference some CSS Tricks ‘history’…isn’t this kind of a modified version of the fading text effect that first made css-tricks pretty popular?
I agree with Steven that a fade to 15-10% could be interesting even if when not faded they were only around 80%, the fact that they pop in and out from no where is a little distracting but nothing to write home about. I really love the new design much better than v6. Although v5 was pretty awesome as well. Great job!
I second that.
I like it. Much cleaner. One thing I’d lose is the fading article footer on the home page. Just my .02$
… although the previous version was also excellent
Degrades well in crappy ‘ol IE8
Nice and clean – don’t care much for the fade either.
I’m not one to critique your design or website. It is original, as long as you like it, that is all that matters.
Poll question bubble does not present well in chrome.
Re-visiting the fade. What’s the point? It does not save any space.
Maybe if I hovered there long enough it should open the rest of the story’s content or something. Otherwise it lends nothing to the page.
As suprsidr mentioned, the poll bubble in chrome appears to have it’s box shadow ignoring the border-radius which sticks out quite significantly.
Other than that, loving the new look Chris, at first I thought all those cool animations were Jquery, can’t wait to start playing around with CSS3 at this level!
The “submit comment” button is also a victim, albeit much less noticeable. Didn’t see it until posting that last comment.
The same problem with a colored background is present on the star that slides to the right when you hover over the posts on the main page.
Only a problem in Chrome so far, both on Mac and PC.
agreed. The poll bubble could use some tidying up.
The new design is very clean and spacious. The grays are very soft on the eyes which is great for readability and surely meets the goal of focusing on content.
If there was a con, in my opinion, I feel that the site has lost a bit of personality. I’ve been an avid reader of your site since its inception. Every version had a clear brand and expressed your style. This one just feels a little too minimal.
Either way, I still love your content. Congrats on the new design!
^__^
It feels clean, I’m a big fan. The only thing I noticed is I feel like it’s a little harder to ‘scan’. Can’t figure out what to attribute that to, but I often get a short break to check the site and it just seems like I have to invest a bit more time in searching through copy to find items of interest. Maybe that was intentional on your part :)
There is actually more on the homepage now, so your drop scan-ability is likely only temporary as you adjust to a new layout. Let me know how that goes for you over time. Thanks for the feedback!
My only criticism is that the type feels a little bit tight, there’s not a lot of white space around it. Version 5 felt the most open and un-cluttered in that respect, imo.
Respect on the 16px too!
This, now rather old, article on web typography is a favourite of mine: 100e2r
To clarify that, I think the tight type affects the “scan-ability”.
I like it as the rest of the commenter before me. It’s clean and easy to read.
As some of the commenter above, i am also not big fan of that fade effect, but tastes are different.
On win7+chrome there is issue with the “Vote” bubble, it has grey edges and Post Headings look somehow choppy also win7+chrome.
Hey man!
Love the new layout – looks great. Super clean..and the new approach on IA is definitely an improvement (last layout was great too, this is just so much better)
As far as critique goes (and I realize this is nitpicky)…I would agree with those above who say drop the fade. It’s an interesting effect, but overall more distracting than helpful.
Aside from that…love it!
(Oh, and the css3 transitions on the footer…super pimp. Feels so much more responsive than a JS animation by far)
I like the new design, there are some issues with the text lengt though.
The first few paragraphs continue for a bit under the grey sidebar. That could be caused by Adblock, but since it also happens under the “Explore” section, I probably isn’t. Also, it happens in the comments.
Anyway, a picture is worth a lot of words:
picture, picture
Hey nice update Chris!
Liking the overall design, and in particular the ‘I work for..’ etc boxes in the footer work very well.
The only small issue I see (might be related to the post above mentioning that its hard to ‘scan’ the page) is that the heading levels are all the same size, would be nicer to have the subheadings a little smaller to be able to “scan to subparts”, I may be crazy, its just what my eyes are telling me!
Great site, love reading the articles here, thanks man!
I like it feels less cluttered.
The search submit and poll question buttons doesn’t render well in Chrome–ubuntu. There’s a background thing going on in the corners.
Another vote to loose the fade-out… Overall a very clean design.
Some minor points:
In the ‘leave a comment’ section there are some alignment issues (using Chrome on Win7).
The use of orange color seems a bit out of place. Somehow it doesn’t fit in in my opinion.
I realy love the footer, just i would find another picture.
Never missed it before, but i’m looking for a way to see previous articles. I know i can get to the archive, but just stepping back in time would be nice.
The text-balloon in the vote section is eh… Just take a look. Something not right with the rounded corners. Same goes for the blue buttons in the main area.
Just my opinions…
Greetings
Yeah, I’ve got this bug too
Leave a comment bug
I think this one should be fixed. The problem was I was outputting that Gravatar amongst the fields. That was unintentional, I had wanted to remove that. Thanks for the screenshot!
No problem. :)
Liking this version much more than the last, but I must add my vote against the fade out effect on the articles list – I think it actually takes away from the clarity of the list items, and (as you’ve gone for light greys and blues) it’s washed-out effect takes away from the strength of the overall theme. I’d contrast it to the sidebar, where things are big, bold, and clearly defined.
Love the footer – and those webkit effects are groovy. Maybe throw a little TLC at the header too? Things are kinda just floating around up there…
Anyhoo, that’s my two cents. Kicks the arse of anything I’d manage, so you’ve always got that! ;)
All the animations and the “fadeouts on the recent articles” are excellent but the Go and Submit Comment buttons’ style is reminiscent of the pre-web 2.0 style, in short: you could have done better, especially with some subtle gradients. Also the tabs’ style is a little too flat for my liking.
Feels squeaky clean and very polished. Love the details like the flips and animations and I like the fade-in on the home page for what its worth. The only thing that catches my eye is the tabs. The rounded corner on the left and not on the right makes me squint a bit as does the last notch (seems like there’s a tab where there isn’t).
Chris,
I actually like the fade effect. I never really liked (even on my site) the “Read More” link sort of marking the end of every post on the listing page.
Good stuff – I’m diggin the new design and the little CSS3 enhancements!
When i first glanced at the website I really didn’t care for the look, it was to boxy and hospital looking with the blue and grey. I then realized that I was looking at it in IE… so i booted up Chrome and omg. Great look, I instantly loved it. It was like I was looking at a whole different design.
For the whole fade article thing everyone is going mother-in-law on you about, leave it. It gives a wow factor and a sense of fun, I agree that it may be confusing and a little pointless but everyone that comes to the site are either developers/designers and knows how to navigate a website.
Keep up the good work.
I would say its a clean layout but for me it perhaps lacks the depth & ‘WOW’ factor of your last few designs……..sorry :( This design is quite flat feeling with too much of a feel of simplicity. The text in the tabs at the top looks a little stretched. Footer is awesome though and love some of the cool techniques you are using in this version.
For me regardless of what this site looks like I will keep coming back because your content is awesome and you’ve really helped me with my own design projects, particularly WordPress ones. Keep up the great work!!!
I agree, the design didn’t have the same reaction I had with the last two design change. It seems a bit too …flat, for lack of better terms.
All in all a great new look and feel. Only thing I’ve noticed is a problem with the comments when viewing with IE7. The comment author information seems to be pushed left under a layer. Took some SS for you:
IE7:
http://pd.alphaready.com/ie7.jpg
IE8:
http://pd.alphaready.com/ie8.jpg
I like the fade out. I agree with your theory that it keeps the page from being too repetitive. White space is your friend! The white space around each article also helps to separate them visually and generally give a clean look to the page. It also looks good on the iphone. Good work Chris.
The whitespace argument is good – but try knocking off the whiteout PNG in Firebug and bumping the ‘post’ div margin up to 35 or 40. Same whitespace, but don’t you find it a stronger, clearer impression and easier to read?
Chris,
I really like the new design. I hear what a few are saying about the loss of some of the “brand” (I do like orange), but I think your true brand is in the quality of content and the accessibility of your content regardless of skill level. And, I think this new design lends itself to both of those bits. It’s clean, simple, utilitarian (as you say), and well thought out (as usual). Well done.
I like the new design and look forward to getting comfortable with the new look and layout.
I notice the ad for BuySellAds.com seems to be duplicated.
Keep up the good work.
I discovered your site just recently, two months ago or so. I was used to your old design so the other day when i was making my daily visit to CSS-Tricks i was surprised. My first thought was that your site was offline.
Then I saw that all the fantastic content was there. I´ve been visiting your site the since then and now, i can say, that i´m used to your new design. I have learned lots of things with your articles and your screencasts, so hear one thing, NEVER, NEVER I’ll lose my respect for you.
Congrats for your site, for your new design and for be a good mate for all us.
Excuse my bad english.
P.S. Why i can´t maximize your videos clicking the maximize icon? I must click on the “Go fullscreen” text.
I´m using the last version of Firefox.
It actually looks more organized and clean, i like it.
Regarding the sidebar, you said is not possible, i made a website a few years ago, fluid with faux column (www.icad.com.ve) using % to position the background, maybe that will do the trick for you.
The flaws i see, below the search field, the sidebar has a square corner on top of the round blue corner, looks weird to me (it even makes a 1px separation on other pages). Your pic at the bottom, shouldn’t have bottom margin, and the triangle of the vote bubble, its out of the bubble. (FF Mac).
My first impression was like “OMG, what happened!!!”, but a few seconds later i noticed the improvements, now i don’t even remember the old one :P.
Nice work.
I’ve got to say I love it, I think the header font is absolutely gorgeous and the overall feel of the site feels relaxing and clean. I have got to agree about the fade on the homepage though, I don’t know what it is about it but I just dont feel like it goes with the rest of the site.
I can’t seem to submit a comment using the latest version of Safari. Had to fire up Firefox, which I don’t usually like to do at home.
And the comment I wanted to make:
Love it! One misspelling distracts me: it’s “quandary,” not “quandry.” Sorry, I can never seem to subdue my inner proofreader!
I’m going to go the cheesy route and just, say you’re the man :) Love the site and the new design. The fade is a little weird but it does make me notice more stuff. Thanks again!
Hi, I’m not commenting graphics since it’s the matter of personal taste. But:
1/ the page is invalid, yes, there is no point in masturbating because of validity, but some issues here are just unnecessary (http://validator.nu/?doc=http://css-tricks.com/design-v7/&showsource=yes)
2/ you can do more with HTML5, I’d suggest to use article element for article, header and footer elements for specifying those parts inside an article (in listing and in single article display). Section element for sections of page (comments section, sections of side bar, etc.). There’s still too much div elements here :)
1) I fixed most of those validation errors, thanks! The only ones left are regarding the results attribute which I don’t care about. Although I have noticed that it isn’t working particularly well on the latest builds of WebKit, so I may end up ditching it.
2) Agreed on HTML5. I’ve done a good amount of transitioning but more semantic elements need to go out. This will happen over time as I mentioned above.
You could replace the “results” attributes with “data-results” attributes, which are valid HTML5: http://html5doctor.com/html5-custom-data-attributes/
I recently started reading your articles through RSS, so I never really saw the old design, but I think this one works well for the type of content you offer. Looks great!
I’ve noticed myself using larger fonts as well, and I think it’s because screen resolutions are constantly growing, resulting in smaller text. A 16px font may have been far too large for your primary text five years ago, but on today’s monitors, larger fonts are expected.
This is not horrible, but I think every design in the archive page was better.
When I first came to the new style I thought it looked kind of odd, now that I have been on it a few times it has already sunken in. The increased font size helps with me because my eye sight is quite poor, really liking the simplicity too!
Great job Chris, I think the new design is a big improvement and I really like the fade. I think it does a good job of reducing the clutter and repetition and looks really sharp.
If anything, I’d say the only problem with latest articles is that the hover on the headlines is very subtle, I have a hard time telling the difference on my screen.
The “Roll” widget is awesome, now that WordPress is starting to strip out the references to blogging, they should totally cut Blogroll down like this.
there still seems to be an issue on the buttons rounded corners : there are straight corners around the speech bubble and blue buttons
otherwise, I love the progressive enhancements and HTML5/CSS3 stuff!
Negatives:
Although the site looks great in FF, and has awesome transitions in chrome, it looks better in FF than chrome.
The search box, buttons, and rounded corners are all messed up in Chrome. They all have a background color that makes them look like IE6 using PNG’s without IEPNGFix.
I’m also of the group that thinks that when you hover over a button, you should have a pointer mouse icon to indicate that you can click it. Your mouse cursor is an arrow on hover.
on the props section, I think that the entire block should be clickable, rather than just the link text. you can do that quickly with jQuery: .click(function(){ window.location = $(this).find(‘a’).attr(‘href’);
Positives:
I love the blue color and minimalist design of the header, it really gets you to the content faster, less scrolling = more content above the “fold”.
I love the new pixelated logo.
I love that the footer is the same BG as the sides and header.
the asterix now indicates: “This website may or may not contain any actual CSS or Tricks.” this is brilliant. I think I like it more than I should.
wow. You’re really taking a hit on the fade. I personally like it. It does accomplish what you were trying to do. Less clutter and it intrigues me enough to want to hover and click.
My favorite update though is the fluid layout. And I’d love to learn more about how you adjusted the sidebar height.
At first, my reaction was like oh no, he changed it? Why?? But, a few things that I have learned as a web designer, is to walk away from a design for a day and revisit and see if you still like it. Well I did, and I do like it.
Very clean, well thought out as usual. I would definitely loose the fade effect in the text. Not sure if there are behind the scene reasons for it, but visually I found it annoying.
Last thoughts… I like the cleanliness of it, but I feel it’s missing some pop. I miss the little airbrushed touches, the slight dimension, and the warm blocks of color from the earlier sites.
Overall though, I’ve always liked your work on this site and careful consideration to detail. I like this version, just think it needs a little more tweaking.
Not the type of design for CSS galleries? Maybe… but i really like this new design, my favorite of all versions. Clean like i love!
Just one thing : Why there isn’t a link “older articles” after the articles’ list?
As I echoed in a tweet, I love the bottom and hate the top.
The footer is perfect, much better than the last change. The CSS hover effect is very nice on the right.
However, the top of the site looks plain and bland. There is a massive grey area. The tabs are my main sticking point. IMO, they look horrible. Bland blue, that just washes into the next tab.
The rest of the site looks great, but there is a bug on Chrome with the Vote bubble – the corner transparency isn’t working.
I hope you understand what I mean. Do ask for further clarification if needs be – I know this is a little “note-ish”.
Overall, thankyou for continually refreshing CSS-Tricks’s design – it freshens the experience. And the “* This website may or may not contain any actual CSS or Tricks” made me chuckle.
Thanks,
After reading your reasons I can understand some of the changes that have been made.
My only real issue now is.. when I look to websites for help in coding etc my 1st impression is always how the site looks as with any site to be fair. The guy behind the site could be a coding genius (which over my time reading this blog you do fit that bill) but if his site isn’t aesthetically pleasing to me I will totally disregard it without a 2nd thought. I would be interested find out whether your new design may decrease the amount of new readers signing up to your RSS feeds. You won’t lose any I wouldn’t have thought but you could gain less.
Hope that meets your critique guidelines – don’t want to get on your bad side.
Keep up the good work with your posts though!
Paul
Hey Chris,
I’m of the ones which didn’t like your site at the first look, and feel free to wave a disapproving finger in my direction if you feel any of this criticism isn’t fair, but I have a few remarks on the site:
1. First things first, the footer (yup, first in deed) is pretty awesome and it’s great you’ve decided on using them “Html 5″ and “CSS 3″ new effects for all us cool WebKit/Gecko users. Also love the banjo (is it?), and the message in the footer.
Kudos for the media queries!
2. Chrome has this weird issue with some of the CSS 3 stuff, and it lacks a lot behind Safari in terms of display. It’s Google’s fault, really – but I thought you should know.
3. My personal opinion is that the text is too big (maybe a serif font would look more suitable for the size?) and that there’s maybe too much space for the main content. Again, since this is only my opinion, maybe others find it better this way.
And that’s what it’s all about!
Hey Chris,
I love the new design, the only small thing that bugs me is the faded text on each post preview on the home page.
I dont know why, but it dont look like it works well with the site. It is also never a good idea to have the user have to hover over something to read more.
Just my 2 cents.
I know you’ve gotten a lot of grief for the listing page fade, but I really like it. All the WordPress/other “blog” sites I follow always end up in my RSS reader because I find the real sites hard to read. I can’t stand the “read more” after every single article and all the clutter. I think you did an excellent job incorporating the fade on the listing page. It allows the user to easily read the opening of each article. I may start coming right to the site now in order to read your posts.
Same thing can be said for the rest of the site. You said it yourself… it’s very utilitarian, and there is nothing wrong with that here. We come here for your great content, no need to have out gaze pulled away from said content with tons of distractions. I think you worked in all the advertising and other content in a nice organized way that keeps the user focused on what’s important. Bravo.
I seem to be the only one so far, but I really like the fading of the article listings! It does break it up a bit, making it easier for me to scan the articles. Clever! :)
The new design really grows on me, and I like it more the more I look at it. The only thing I don’t like so far, are the blue buttons and the search input. They don’t feel up to par with the rest of the site.
Love the redesign. Not sure if anyone has suggested this yet, but the CSS3
display: table;anddisplay: table-cell;could probably fix your problems with the sidebar height and whatnot. Your CSS would look like this:Then you could just use conditionals to use the javascript technique in browsers that don’t support this.
I tried this! I ended up having a bunch of issues. I can’t even remember what they all were. One of them was that I wanted to yank up the sidebar to overlap the nav bar a bit and that was being weird. One is lack of IE7 support. I also needed another wrapping element to behave as table-row. Anyway, I might try that again someday, after I’ve exhausted a few other options.
Hi Chris,
The footer is fun. And thanks for bumping up the text size! For those of us online all day, it really helps!
My only critique is that I’m not loving the blue. It’s given the overall site a much colder feel, almost a bit clinical. Which I think is at odds with your personality and down-to-earth style. The blue in links is also hard to read on the soft grey. I think a slightly darker shade with a touch of orange will make it easier to read and more compatible with your signature orange.
(Sorry about my color-mixing…I still think of mixing colors as actual pigments…you know, throw in the complementary color to reduce saturation, etc.!)
I was just thinking, instead of using two div’s for the vote speech bubble couldnt you just use
box-shadow: 1px 1px 0 #yourcolour
I havent tested it but I would think it would acheive the same effect
Hey Chris….I like where the redesign is going. I think the previous versions felt like a personal website and this feels bigger (and is I guess) and more aligned to smashing magazine…feels pro.
As a critique, the design feels a little unfinished. I know you want to cut down on images and I agree. The navigation however I think could be thought out more. It kinda feels like a prototype or a bit unfinished. I always find it hardest to design navigation bars myself but I think yours could do with a bit more presence?, know what I mean?
Personally, I like the fade out on the posts and agree it hides unnecessary text until you engage with that article. I would like to see thumbnails of images relating to that article just to spice it up a bit but like you said, you want it to be quick.
Overall, I like it. Cleaner, faster, smarter, more productive. I can only imagine how hard it is to incorporate all the information that you have here so that it is displayed nice and consistently.
I think the blue contrasts with the orange a bit too much. Visually, the contrast feels like a brain freeze from an iced slurpy. I think there is too much blue because it really pops. Perhaps use some more of the fire colors such as a yellow. The gray (grey?) mellows it out a bit more and I really like the banjo pic.
But this could all be because I’m listening to your grooveshark page and I like the orange-yellow-day-at-the-beach theme.
I miss the links to your other sites in the footer, DigWP and Script & Style.
The new js is just fawesome for the UI. I’m very curious about the 3D flipping effect.
Is there a reason my HD revs up every-time I visit CSS tricks?
Thanks for listening to my opinion.
New design breaks pretty bad in IE6 (at least via IETester). Did you make a conscious decision to abandon IE6? What do your stats show for IE6 users? I imagine you get a fair amount of international traffic and I believe IE6 is still pretty big in SE Asia.
Yep I have completely ignored IE6 for now. The only stats that matter are the stats for this site and I’m at under 1% for IE 6, and I bet some percentage of that is people visiting the site on purpose with that old browser just to see =)
On the last design I used the Universal IE 6 CSS, and I may go back to that, haven’t gotten that far yet.
I wouldn’t bother with IE6. After all, your articles discuss modern approaches to design. IE6 should have died out years ago but it’s just stuck around dragging everyone down with it. And I think you’re right; most of your IE6 users are probably just nosy designers wondering if you’re still offering an IE6 functional experience.
I love it all, happily can live with one mans design especially when he puts as much thought into it as yourself.
The fonts being 16px fits perfectly, it reads lovely doesn’t look dis-proportioned and just makes sense.
The colour scheme is light and airy, there have been no strains when digesting the content.
Advertisements are clear and concise, if i was ever going to click an advert it would be here at css-tricks.com
I’m glad you re-jiggled the footer, it was always the part that was most crowded in my mind.
The new smaller excerpts on the home page are much more suitable. In comparison to the previous design seemed like you were trying to squeeze a lot in. For me at least the breathing space is perfect.
Comments are tidy.
That’s about all i got right now.
About the fade, in the latest articles section:
Nice effect, well done, like it.
Though, it might give the impression that the article headings are part of the same article.
It misses maybe, in my opinion, an orange “hr” Chris Coyier style, a border of some kind or whatever may help distinguish the articles’ blocks, in a blink of an eye.
Plus, I’d like an over effect on the headings, please. Or an active one?
Thank you, awesome 2010 design.Huge footer picture, totally beats previous one, so web.now!
Can’t wait for v8! :p (just kidding)
I think I’m with the others who feel that the main page fade feature is a good thing in theory, but not as effective in practice. For me, I’d like to see something that more obviously breaks up posts. Right now it’s a fade to white, and then your next header title and it’s just not breaking it up enough. I find my eyes glazing through thinking I’m still reading a little blurb from one post, when I actually happen to be 2 posts down.
The new design is more utilitarian. It reminds me of the sort of minimalist look you get from a forum-driven site and I’m not sure just how I feel about that yet as it’s coming across a bit ‘sterile’ right now and before, I always felt that your site had a more personal touch.
Viewing your site now on Google Chrome in OSX, and there has got to be about a full page worth of scrolling between the comment ‘remember’ text and the actual page footer. Just nothing but white space. I’m guessing that’s a bug from your jQuery equal columns script?
Nice redesign, Chris!
The transitions in the sidebar and the footer are great! (nice details)
I like the colors and the grid/(fluid)layout in general – and your new picture in the footer. :-D
I’m just not sure about the background pattern.
But regardless of the new design – your content and your support/help is great!
You really helped me out a couple of times – thanks!
I feel like the navigation and the CSS-Tricks brand is much more pronounced in this new design.
The new design seems less like a web developers blog and more like a community of CSS enthusiasts. For example I always read the articles at this site but never bothered looking into the forums, but since this redesign I registered.
The whole page just feels lighter as a whole. Even the ads don’t really feel like they clutter up the page. I like how you broke out of a more monochromatic color scheme and went complimentary with the orange and blue. Really flexes some design muscle because that’s not always easy to pull off. Comments blend into the page, nice and clean.
Great work and very nice of you to share some of the inner workings of your site and what you did where.
Just a subtle thing I noticed and I watched your “Pet Peeve” screencast not long ago, but on your videos page your links shift 1px. Not sure if you intended this “button press” effect or not.
It looks good. I don’t think is a big deal, but I discovered that when I resize the window and make it smaller, when you make it bigger again,you get a huge white space at the bottom.
I really like the new layout – especially on the single article pages. I think the bigger font is a good choice.
My only beef comes on the home page with the fading. I find it actually detracts from my ability to quickly scan over the articles. For whatever reason it makes the home page a lot more cluttered to my eyes.
Some first impressions: maybe a bit too gray, indeed. Not entirely convinced by the opacity effect on some divisions. I like the font chosen for the header lines and the style of the class .meta .read-more.
Chris,
I enjoy the lighter feel to this design, it is less bold than previous versions, but I don;t feel that you’ve lost any character. I haven’t noticed anything that doesn’t sit well with me.
I do particularly like the interesting shape of the tabs, I like how they are asymmetrical.
I also enjoy the clever footnote that you made with the logo, and the “This website may or may not contain any actual CSS or Tricks.” statement above the footer. I think it presents your stance on the long fought battle of the name of the site and relevance of it’s topics.
That outline highlight? Try
input { outline:none; }
I love the new design. I like how it’s clean and simple. To me, it’s much easier to read than the last version.
I’m not sure why people aren’t digging the fade out on the main page, but I love it!
I must say I’m disappointed…
I love css-tricks and all your work you’ve doing, but this update just isn’t good for my taste.
It needs more white space areas, it has way too much blue IMHO. I had already associated css-tricks to orange and even that blue is a complemetary color I think it should be less blue and more orange. I know the blues also tend to be associated with technologies and that’s good. What I mean is that McDonalds just can’t get rid of the red color for ANY reason/ideia someone may come up with. That’s way too much deep-seated to be changed.
So, i like the blue, i just don’t like the way you used it. CSS-Tricks is now a colder place.
Just my 2 cents, but i still love you Chris and still love this place!
…also, the sidebar gets useless at some point and eats something like 1/3 of the total width.
I agree that it does seem cleaner and easier to view and find info at the cost of a little of the aesthetics. It is a fine line that we walk in web design and I think that you have hit the mark here. After all, if your average reader is like me they do not come here to be wow’ed by your layout.. they are here to be wow’ed by your content which I am on a daily basis..
And I will second the small bug/issue with the large quantity of white space below the comments area.. I did not measure it but I would guess that there is well over 1000px of space below the “leave a comment” and the footer. This only happens if you re-size your browser so it is not a huge issue but it is a head-scratcher…
Good luck and keep up the great content.. it is why I come.
Chris… I would assume that with all the comments about the bottom fade on each post that you are at least re-considering it. Personally, I found it intriguing… the first visit. I do like the readability that the visual spacing gives, along with the font. It probably is a personal quirk but I seem to be oversensitive to being “socially engineered” when I see it on web-sites and I have to tell you that I felt “compelled” to keep hovering on that flippin’ thing. It does become a bit tiresome and distracting for re-visits (you DID ask) – reminiscent to me of .
One thing not commented on previously is that I enjoy hearing about your “thinking” behind the choices – and knowing that there was some thought in it besides “I think that looks nice.” I realize that you are not the only one; but I’ve wondered for some time why the “gurus” of web-design’s sites’ seemed to all be fixed width. In the never-ending browser war over desk-top real estate, it seemed to me that all that ‘wasted’ side border rose to the “think-of-all-the-starving-children-in-Biafra” level of wastefulness. And it seems that there are a lot more users with wider screens than there are who use “chrome” or “safari.” (for perspective in coding choices) I am enjoying the less scrolling, but still wondering why you stopped short of full screen width – is it just too complicated or difficult or something that I’m not aware of?
Lastly, (because it’s personal preference), If I had to choose only one – I would say keep the exasperating shading and bring back some graphics. For me it’s the most time consuming part of posting (generating the header graphics) BUT, much more than white space, THAT is what visually scans for post delineations AND gives interest to the page. You’ve always done it exceptionally well. I put this last because I realize that it’s personal preference, and as long as it stays limited to your site and doesn’t become a web-developer trend thingy, just gives us welcome diversity. However, my thoughts about the web as an interesting place to ‘hang out’ are that (even though Google has said it’s going to use its ‘bully pulpit’ to page rank for speed) if all my favorite sites (Envato, remy etc.) were like this it would be a gray place indeed. Isn’t there a happy medium? Just an observation – visually, this page full of comments and avatars seems more artistically appealing than does the home page (ignoring all the ads- which I always do). While some might consider dropping the graphics a ‘best practice,’ to me it’s not a ‘good’ practice.
Oh… and perhaps you could post about the meaning and origin of all those clever tag lines in the side bar (“manly pride and friendship,” “hands of comrades clasping,” “forms and shows”) A poem? And, while I’m at it – is there a story behind the origin of the asterisk icon? You do “branding” very well.
I see that my sentence “reminiscent of ” didn’t come through – and there was no way for me to go back and edit my comment – so I’ll correct it in a reply… sorry.
“reminiscent of <flash>” – I’ll get it right yet.
I appreciate that Chris chose to stop at 1200 pixels (700px for the main body of text). Since this site is loaded with content, readability has to be carefully considered. Full width is definitely going to affect sentence length, and I, for one, would end up having to use my finger against my screen to keep my spot.
Nice work, Chris :)
Looks good, love the blue.
My only critique would be to darken the background a little. I wouldn’t mind a little more contrast between the background and the content area.
I just noticed the enhanced boxes you give to yourself and “favorite posters” in the comments – that is neat. Am I just now noticing it or have you always done that? A request for a future post – how do you do that?
I always look forward to your site tweaks and overhauls. It keeps me on my toes. :)
Admittedly, it’ll take some getting used to this latest one. I do like the attention to little details that you do so well, but overall it seems lacking in the color “pop” of your previous versions. It feels kinda dreary and almost corporate-ly non-design-y, if that makes any sense.
Just my $0.02 :)
From an “Art” stand, I like the previous version better, this one is kidna boring, but from an “Informational Site” point of view, its a lot cleaner and easier to read (for me anyway), but hey! Its your site. I still like it, and will continue to come here for learning css and other things. (I have learned a lot)
Keep up the good work!
Thanks,
Aaron
Actually its beautiful….
Love the fade effect
At first the new design really scared me… I’ve been a reader of this blog for several years now and that redesign was the most surpraising one :D
I looks really fresh and I think the colors are better :)
At the second visit I started to like it :D
I dont’t really like the logo though.. I like the text after it but not the CSS-TRICKS thing.. it looks cheap..
Cheap?! That’s Gotham Condensed.
=)
One of my favorite things about the redesign is the type, especially the logo and the sidebar titles.
There’s some pros and some cons to this layout I think…
Firstly, the footer is excellent. The little rollover things are great, as are the ones in the sidebar.
You’ve managed to cram a lot in without load times being too bad, which is also great. I like the comments section too – it all makes sense with the shades of grey and the orange/blue borders drawing attention to specific comments.
However I do agree with a lot of people here – the tabs at the top are a bit dull and I don’t like how there is an extra one on the far right when viewing the site at its widest. Perhaps change them to make them more like the lovely “submit comment” button I can see right here?
The fadeout thing makes sense, but if you’re going to do that maybe AJAXify the read more button so it loads in the page rather than reloading the page?
It’s surprising to find a Tweet button but no Like button, but understandable and I’d be more likely to tweet an article from here than Facebook it.
And finally, I’ve been having a little trouble with the search bar – when I start typing it shows searches from my history but these don’t change depending on what I type, they stay the same. Of course it might be a Chrome glitch.
As always, it’s great. Keep up the good work Chris (and maybe do a screencast on all the little details people might not notice?) :)
Chris–
Brillaint job (:
Really liking “This website may or may not contain any actual CSS or Tricks.” (( I don’t ever remember seeing that before, so if it was around.. ))
Also, nice Forrst badge ;)
I think it’s the best CSS-Tricks design to date.
BUT the fade-out effect is wrong, it goes against the general ‘easy to read’ approach of the site. It makes it more difficult to read and creates some confusion.
Dude Love the Cleaner look, in my non professional opinion I would expect a little more on the header but besides that love the footer and main content area!
Good Job!! Once day I just might get this good !!! LOL
Oh one more thing Love the disclaimer!!!!!
“This website may or may not contain any actual CSS or Tricks.” LOL
on IE7, the commenters name and picture are not visble, they are off to the left somehwere. looks ok in FF, have not tried Chrome yet.
usually use IE7 for general web surfing here, PC is not updated to IE8 yet. I guess I have always used IE since I started with Windows 95 and continue to do so, use FF and Chrome too, but not for the majority of my surfing.
Al
The IE7 comment problem is definitely real and definitely needs to be fixed. Sorry about the trouble there and that should be fixed within a week or two at worst.
Interesting stuff. Not really digging much of it though. I feel like some things were crowbarred in just to use a certain technique. Like the main nav for example. The last 2 versions had nice looking and functioning main navigations. I feel like this navigation lost the artistic look in favor of round borders just for the purpose of using CSS to create them.
Not sure why you changed your main logo, and I’m find the homepage a little confusing to read quickly. The animations in the footer are pretty sick though.
Just my opinions..and I do give you mad props for the amount of time you spend on putting out new versions of the theme design..never an easy thing to find time to work on your own website.
The logo hasn’t changed.
I can see where you are coming with with the barrage of different techniques in use. For example the flipcards. It’s not like there is a theme going on that compliments that particular animation/interaction. However, it’s a full fledged CSS-Trick! So I kind of like the idea that there are all these little nuggets of CSS trickery scattered throughout, even if they are a bit unrelated or “crowbarred.”
Hehe, it’s interesting to see how the logo without your recognizable asterisk (“star”) seems different to some – when in fact you only removed the “tag” that used to be there. :)
I think it’s because people didn’t notice the actual “CSS-tricks” part of the logo in the previous design – it was kind of hidden and small in the upper left corner.
It seems to be a really nice design, the only problem is doesn’t work very well with Chromium (v5.0.375.99 (51029) Ubuntu 10.04) :’(